Corporate training and leadership development
Practice better decision-making with your teams and leaders.
DQNavigator supports facilitated Decision Quality workshops that connect a practical decision framework with team evidence, independent assessment, and management discussion.
Discuss a corporate workshopWhat is Decision Quality training?
Decision Quality training helps people distinguish a good decision process from a fortunate outcome. Participants learn to frame the right decision, develop meaningful alternatives, examine uncertainty, clarify values and trade-offs, reason carefully, and build commitment to action.
DQNavigator supports the practical application of these ideas. Participants work with a shared decision workspace or assess a defined decision package, giving a facilitator concrete evidence to use in discussion.
Two complementary workshop pathways
Both workshop pathways are available for facilitated delivery. Scope, dates, delivery format, and platform access are agreed for each engagement.
DQ for Teams: build the decision
Team members develop a decision through six connected steps. They clarify the frame, generate alternatives, identify important information, compare what matters, examine reasoning, and prepare a commitment plan. The facilitator can guide progress and help the team revisit weak evidence.
This pathway is relevant to project teams, analysts, decision owners, and cross-functional groups that prepare recommendations.
See the DQ for Teams workshop: activities, outputs, and preparation.
DQ for Management: assess the decision
Leaders review a frozen evidence baseline and assess it independently before discussion. Aggregate results and areas of disagreement help the facilitator focus the conversation on the quality of the evidence and the conditions needed to move forward.
This pathway is relevant to management committees, sponsors, executives, and other people who challenge or approve important decisions.
See the DQ for Management workshop: evidence, assessment, and discussion.
See a practical example
Our worked Decision Quality example follows a fictional customer-support decision through all six steps and shows the questions management should ask before commitment.
What participants practice
- Separating the decision from a predetermined preferred answer
- Developing alternatives that represent real choices
- Identifying uncertainty and deciding what information is worth obtaining
- Making evaluation criteria and trade-offs explicit
- Testing a recommendation against changing assumptions
- Turning commitment into ownership, actions, and checkpoints
How the software supports learning
Team workspaces retain the reasoning developed during an exercise. Management assessments make independent judgments visible through controlled aggregate results. Facilitators can use this evidence to discuss why views differ and which parts of the decision need more work.
A workshop can introduce a shared language for decision work. Organizations exploring ongoing application can also examine the enterprise decision governance workflow.
Who develops DQNavigator?
DQNavigator is developed by Project Victor Co., Ltd. Its application of Decision Quality combines established principles with the platform's own workflows and assessment design. Read the methodology and research basis for authorship, references, and the distinction between established principles and proprietary assessment content.
How do we scope a workshop?
Tell us the audience, approximate group size, country and location, preferred delivery format, and the decisions participants need to handle. We will discuss suitable scope, facilitation, platform access, timing, and commercial terms. Delivery arrangements are agreed for the engagement.
Explore team workspaces · Explore management assessment · Read the Decision Quality guide
Build a workshop around the decisions your people face.
Share your learning objectives and the roles you want to bring together.
Discuss Decision Quality training